2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational hip joint simulator for wear and heat generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach yielded contact pressures in the range of 8-20 MPa for loads of 0.5-5 N. The maximum contact pressure in CoCrMo versus CoCrMo hip joints is 70 MPa, however, pressure is not distributed evenly over the contact area and this high pressure is only experienced at a small part. 17,18 In addition, an unrealistically large amount of adhesive wear occurred when the contact pressure was increased above 20 MPa in the pin-on-disc measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach yielded contact pressures in the range of 8-20 MPa for loads of 0.5-5 N. The maximum contact pressure in CoCrMo versus CoCrMo hip joints is 70 MPa, however, pressure is not distributed evenly over the contact area and this high pressure is only experienced at a small part. 17,18 In addition, an unrealistically large amount of adhesive wear occurred when the contact pressure was increased above 20 MPa in the pin-on-disc measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been published on determining wear in prosthetic devices which have mainly focused on the articulating surfaces between the head and acetabular (plastic) cup [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Modern large diameter Metal-on-Metal (MoM) THRs were introduced around 1997 [12] as an option for young active patients to provide a device with reduced wear debris and risk of dislocation, greater strength and longer life than Metal-on-Plastic (MoP) types.…”
Section: Fig 1 Schematic Of Total Hip Replacement In Situmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the available literature on this subject is mostly formulated on the tribological level, in the measure that the geometrical properties (e.g., clearance size) of the hip implants are not considered as variables. The kinematic (e.g., angular velocities) and dynamic (e.g., applied forces) characteristics of the hip elements are also assumed to be constant in most of the studies [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%