2020
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Intelligence for Studying Sustainability Challenges: Tools and Methods for Dealing With Deep Uncertainty and Complexity

Abstract: The study of sustainability challenges requires the consideration of multiple coupled systems that are often complex and deeply uncertain. As a result, traditional analytical methods offer limited insights with respect to how to best address such challenges. By analyzing the case of global climate change mitigation, this paper shows that the combination of high-performance computing, mathematical modeling, and computational intelligence tools, such as optimization and clustering algorithms, leads to richer ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using RDM's vulnerability analysis techniques, we evaluate strategies under an array of future conditions and assumptions to understand the potential range of outcomes and conditions that lead strategies to meet or fail to meet decarbonization and economic goals. This methodology has had success in Latin America not only for decarbonization planning (Groves et al, 2020;Quirós-Tortós et al, 2021, Benavides et al, 2021Arguello et al, 2022), but also for resilient water and transport planning in the face of climate uncertainties (Kalra et al, 2015;Groves et al, 2021;Molina-Perez et al, 2019;Olaya et al, 2020), and global sustainability policies (Lempert et al, 2003;Molina-Perez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Approach To Assessing Emissions Costs and Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using RDM's vulnerability analysis techniques, we evaluate strategies under an array of future conditions and assumptions to understand the potential range of outcomes and conditions that lead strategies to meet or fail to meet decarbonization and economic goals. This methodology has had success in Latin America not only for decarbonization planning (Groves et al, 2020;Quirós-Tortós et al, 2021, Benavides et al, 2021Arguello et al, 2022), but also for resilient water and transport planning in the face of climate uncertainties (Kalra et al, 2015;Groves et al, 2021;Molina-Perez et al, 2019;Olaya et al, 2020), and global sustainability policies (Lempert et al, 2003;Molina-Perez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Approach To Assessing Emissions Costs and Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent progress in cognitive science and computational intelligence offers an opportunity to develop an integrated theoretical framework to study the interaction of CITs with human decision-makers in high-stakes decision contexts. For example, CITs can improve the decision-making process in crises providing decision-makers with new data, enabling quick estimation of likely consequences in a broader range of circumstances, and facilitating the identification of key decision trade-offs [ 4 ]. However, if CITs are implemented in a way that overwhelms users with excessive detail and complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%