2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11831-016-9208-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Methods for Elastoplasticity: An Overview of Conventional and Less-Conventional Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 202 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulties associated with a reliable implementation of integration schemas have limited the employment of complex model [30][31][32].…”
Section: Importance Of Integration Methods For the Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulties associated with a reliable implementation of integration schemas have limited the employment of complex model [30][31][32].…”
Section: Importance Of Integration Methods For the Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the residual of the transverse normal stress is incorporated into the internal force vectors. Considering the importance of the mechanical formulations, these numerical algorithms have been employed in practical situation 18‐20 . Thus, the mechanical approach using the path independent scheme is extended to the field of the sensitivity analysis 21‐23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fincato and Tsutsumi 30 treated the extended subloading surface model by the closest‐point projection method and proposed a return mapping algorithm for the subloading surface model of plasticity and damage 31 . Scalet and Auricchio 32 reviewed the conventional and nonconventional integration approaches to the constitutive equations and discussed computational issues in the solution of the equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%