2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational methods to automate the initial interpretation of lower extremity arterial Doppler and duplex carotid ultrasound studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automatic analysis of images and videos is currently achieved by Computer Vision in numerous medical branches. In vascular diseases computational carotid plaque composition and stenosis analysis [5][6][7][8][9], automatic detection and characterization of ischemic brain lesion [10], 3-dimensional analysis of aneurysms morphology or post-endovascular repair endoleak surveillance [11][12][13][14][15], duplex scan (DS) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance imaging identification, localization and quantification of PAD disease [16][17][18] are examples of AI tools for optimizing surgical or endovascular strategies.…”
Section: Automatic Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Automatic analysis of images and videos is currently achieved by Computer Vision in numerous medical branches. In vascular diseases computational carotid plaque composition and stenosis analysis [5][6][7][8][9], automatic detection and characterization of ischemic brain lesion [10], 3-dimensional analysis of aneurysms morphology or post-endovascular repair endoleak surveillance [11][12][13][14][15], duplex scan (DS) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance imaging identification, localization and quantification of PAD disease [16][17][18] are examples of AI tools for optimizing surgical or endovascular strategies.…”
Section: Automatic Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTA automatic peripheral vessel identification to localize and quantify disease has been reported in a study by Dai et al [17] where they used a convolutional neural network based on 17050 axial images in 265 PAD patients to classify above and below-knee artery stenosis with an accuracy greater then 90% in the majority of stenosis classes. Also, Doppler waveforms can be integrated in neural networks to detect and classify PAD with an accuracy of 0.69, 1, and 0.86 for mono, bi and triphasic waveforms, respectively [16].…”
Section: Peripheral Arterial Disease (Pad) and Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DUS provides a moderate to strong correlation with MRI [ 12 ]. In aortoiliac segments, DUS demonstrated 90% sensitivity, 85.0% specificity, 89.6% positive predictive value (PPV), 85.4% negative predictive value (NPV), and 88% accuracy [ 25 ]. To map the femoral arteries, the patient is positioned supine, and the procedure is repeated with the hip laterally rotated [ 20 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a strong degree of concordance between DUS and CTA in the right femoral (0.82 [0.69-0.95]) and left femoral (0.88 [0.76-1]) arteries [ 24 ]. In the femoropopliteal segments, DUS provided 94.8% sensitivity, 80.2% specificity, 94.1% PPV, 89.0% NPV, and 90.1% accuracy [ 25 ]. The best hemodynamic parameter to assess femoropopliteal stenosis is proximal PSV (>50%: proximal PSV=2.6, >70%: proximal PSV=3.3, >80%: proximal PSV=3.9) [ 26 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable and useful indicator of atherosclerosis is the so-called intima-media (IM) thickness, defined as the distance from the lumenintima (LI) to the media-adventitia (MA) interface. Most studies have been devoted to the improvement of early atherosclerosis diagnosis; in this respect, three main issues are considered: detection [95,[102][103][104][105][106][107], segmentation [108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115], and classification [116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128].…”
Section: Arteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%