2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-815-7_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Methods to Study Kinetics of DNA Replication

Abstract: New technologies such as DNA combing have led to the availability of large quantities of data that describe the state of DNA while undergoing replication in S phase. In this chapter, we describe methods used to extract various parameters of replication -fork velocity, origin initiation rate, fork density, numbers of potential and utilized origins -from such data. We first present a version of the technique that applies to "ideal" data. We then show how to deal with a number of real-world complications, such as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An advantage of simulation is that, with modest computer resources (especially if simulations keep track of only positions of forks and origins rather than use a lattice for each point on the genome [95]), one can recreate in silico not only the ideal experimental scenario envisaged, but also any relevant experimental details. For example, it is straightforward to include the effects of asynchrony in the cell population, finite microscope resolution, labeling artifacts, and the like [96]. Once the artifacts and the replication scenario are chosen correctly, the simulation can reproduce, within statistical error, the data from any given scenario.…”
Section: Box 1 F and I: Mathematical Functions That Describe Replicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of simulation is that, with modest computer resources (especially if simulations keep track of only positions of forks and origins rather than use a lattice for each point on the genome [95]), one can recreate in silico not only the ideal experimental scenario envisaged, but also any relevant experimental details. For example, it is straightforward to include the effects of asynchrony in the cell population, finite microscope resolution, labeling artifacts, and the like [96]. Once the artifacts and the replication scenario are chosen correctly, the simulation can reproduce, within statistical error, the data from any given scenario.…”
Section: Box 1 F and I: Mathematical Functions That Describe Replicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works provide a solid foundation to formulate more complex models appropriate to cells where origin location is less random and fork velocity is more variable (Yang et al 2009). The fact that a large genome can be faithfully duplicated while initiating origins randomly raises the question why initiation is random neither in space nor in time in many other organisms or in later developmental stages.…”
Section: Relating Replication Initiation Rate To Replication End Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With large data sets comes the potential to construct a much more detailed picture of how replication occurs and is regulated ( Hyrien and Goldar, 2010 ). For molecular-combing experiments, previous work has shown that quantitative information such as replication-origin firing rates and replication-fork velocities can be extracted ( Yang et al, 2009 ). Such information has led to an appreciation of the function of stochastic effects in initiation ( Herrick and Bensimon, 1999 ), to a greater understanding of the ‘random-completion problem' for embryonic replication ( Yang and Bechhoefer, 2008 ), to models highlighting searching and binding kinetics in initiation timing ( Gauthier and Bechhoefer, 2009 ), and to suggestions that initiation patterns may be universal across species ( Goldar et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%