2010
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511760402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Models of Conditioning

Abstract: Since first described, multiple properties of classical conditioning have been discovered, establishing the need for mathematical models to help explain the defining features. The mathematical complexity of the models puts our understanding of their workings beyond the ability of our intuitive thinking and makes computer simulations irreplaceable. The complexity of the models frequently results in function redundancy, a natural property of biologically evolved systems that is much desired in technologically de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 311 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it is widely accepted that classical conditioning is at the basis of most learning phenomena and behavior and thus paramount that we develop accurate models of conditioning. In this endeavor, collaboration between psychologists and computer scientists has enjoyed considerable success (Schmajuk, 2010a;Schmajuk, 2010b;Alonso & Mondragón, 2011). This collaboration is sustained on well-known arguments: Expressing models as sets of algorithms grants us formal ways of representing psychological intuitions and means of calculating their predictions accurately and quickly; from computational models we also borrow a view, the so-called computer metaphor, on how information is processed that has proved useful in understanding cognition; moreover, the architectures in which computational models are implemented, artificial neural networks for instance, resemble those of associative learning, both at conceptual and neural levels; finally, machine learning models, such as temporal difference learning and Bayesian learning, can be viewed as effective abstractions of how associations are formed and processed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is widely accepted that classical conditioning is at the basis of most learning phenomena and behavior and thus paramount that we develop accurate models of conditioning. In this endeavor, collaboration between psychologists and computer scientists has enjoyed considerable success (Schmajuk, 2010a;Schmajuk, 2010b;Alonso & Mondragón, 2011). This collaboration is sustained on well-known arguments: Expressing models as sets of algorithms grants us formal ways of representing psychological intuitions and means of calculating their predictions accurately and quickly; from computational models we also borrow a view, the so-called computer metaphor, on how information is processed that has proved useful in understanding cognition; moreover, the architectures in which computational models are implemented, artificial neural networks for instance, resemble those of associative learning, both at conceptual and neural levels; finally, machine learning models, such as temporal difference learning and Bayesian learning, can be viewed as effective abstractions of how associations are formed and processed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%