2001
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524885.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Neuroscience of Vision

Abstract: UNIVERSITY PRESS χ Ι Contents 2.4 Computational processes that give rise to V1 simple cells 49 2.4.1 Linsker's method: Information maximization 50 2.4.2 Olshausen and Field's method: Sparseness maximization 53 2.5 The computational role of V1 for form processing 2.6 Backprojections to the lateral geniculate nucleus Extrastriate visual areas 57 65 3.4.2 Depth perception The parietal cortex 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Spatial processing in the parietal cortex 4.2.1 Area LIP 71 4.2.2 Area VIP 4.2.3 Area MST 4.2.4 Area 7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
531
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(550 citation statements)
references
References 557 publications
17
531
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We wanted to investigate the option of retaining some geometric information above the S2 level. In fact, neurons in V4 and IT do not exhibit full invariance and are known to have receptive fields limited to only a portion of the visual field and range of scales [30]. To model this, we simply restrict the region of the visual field in which a given S2 feature can be found, relative to its location in the image from which it was originally sampled, to ±t p % of image size and ±t s scales, where t p and t s are global parameters.…”
Section: Original Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wanted to investigate the option of retaining some geometric information above the S2 level. In fact, neurons in V4 and IT do not exhibit full invariance and are known to have receptive fields limited to only a portion of the visual field and range of scales [30]. To model this, we simply restrict the region of the visual field in which a given S2 feature can be found, relative to its location in the image from which it was originally sampled, to ±t p % of image size and ±t s scales, where t p and t s are global parameters.…”
Section: Original Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the bottom-up neocortical model, the two distributed neuronal nodes perform cognitive actions considering chained unidirectional information flow. It is observed that, at the algorithmic levels, the cognitive functions become computationally intractable although living species perform such functions without delay [15]. The reason is that, the living organisms often employ heuristics and greedy algorithmic models in problem solving.…”
Section: Co-published By Atlantis Press and Taylor And Francismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural networks describe contours by a hierarchical integration of their local orientations in a pyramid space (e.g. (Serre et al, 2007;Hansen and Neumann, 2004;Amit and Mascaro, 2003;VanRullen and Thorpe, 2002;Rolls and Deco, 2002)). Yet such a description is essentially template matching in a more refined form.…”
Section: Previous Contour Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%