2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8304-5_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Phantoms for Organ Dose Calculations in Radiation Protection and Imaging

Abstract: Dosimetry for ionizing radiation has to do with the determination of amount and distribution pattern of the energy deposited in a part or parts of the human body from internal or external radiation sources. To protect against occupational exposures, dose limits for radiosensitive organs are recommended by international organizations and are adopted as national regulations. In both diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine, X-ray photons and gamma rays traverse through body tissues to form images of the anatomy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 181 publications
(134 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These computational models have proved useful in areas of quality control of imaging systems [20,21] and in radiation dosimetry [22]. Even with more sophisticated geometrical structures [23][24][25] and more spatial detail, these approaches lack the ability to accurately represent the statistical variability found in humans, organs and tissues. While these simpler models remain practical and useful for some tasks, the lack of realism and variability makes them unsuitable for generating digital humans for in silico imaging trials.…”
Section: Individual Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These computational models have proved useful in areas of quality control of imaging systems [20,21] and in radiation dosimetry [22]. Even with more sophisticated geometrical structures [23][24][25] and more spatial detail, these approaches lack the ability to accurately represent the statistical variability found in humans, organs and tissues. While these simpler models remain practical and useful for some tasks, the lack of realism and variability makes them unsuitable for generating digital humans for in silico imaging trials.…”
Section: Individual Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%