2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational proteomics pitfalls and challenges: HavanaBioinfo 2012 Workshop report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). Unlike genomics, the under-developed tools for proteomic analysis have many pitfalls [149–151]. However, use of databases such as NCBI, UniProtKB, Swiss-Prot, Protein Information resource (PIR) and OWL, has streamlined protein identification pipeline (Table 4).…”
Section: Proteomics and Metabolomics In Pulmonary Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). Unlike genomics, the under-developed tools for proteomic analysis have many pitfalls [149–151]. However, use of databases such as NCBI, UniProtKB, Swiss-Prot, Protein Information resource (PIR) and OWL, has streamlined protein identification pipeline (Table 4).…”
Section: Proteomics and Metabolomics In Pulmonary Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bottom-up proteomics is currently the standard analytical method to identify and quantify proteins based on the presence of peptides obtained by digestion of the protein mix during sample preparation. Current computational approaches can typically be broken down into three main steps: 1) peptide identification, 2) quality assessment of the peptide identifications, and 3) the assembly of the identified peptides into a final protein list using protein inference algorithms (7,8). During peptide identification, peptide fragmentation spectra (MS/MS) are assigned to peptide sequences to generate a set of Peptide-Spectrum Matches (PSMs) using database search engines, such as Mascot (9), MS-GF+ (10), or X!Tandem (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the vast improvement in biological data visualisation tools and libraries, two major challenges remain at present: How to benefit from this multi‐scale complex data without being overwhelmed . Clear objectives are needed to drive the design process in order to truly benefit from the visualisation. The advances in visualisation are not adequately described and shared within the biological scientific community . Without the help of the visualisation practitioners, it can be a daunting task for scientists to determine the best visualisation option among the vast range of choices. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%