2018
DOI: 10.1115/1.4041028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Rod Model With User-Defined Nonlinear Constitutive Laws

Abstract: Computational rod models have emerged as efficient tools to simulate the bending and twisting deformations of a variety of slender structures in engineering and biological applications. The dynamics of such deformations, however, strongly depends on the constitutive law in bending and torsion that, in general, may be nonlinear, and vary from material to material. Jacobian-based computational rod models require users to change the Jacobian if the functional form of the constitutive law is changed, and hence are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in the analysis presented here, the constitutive equations as embodied in Eqs. ( 5) and ( 6) are linear and local, the method can be adapted to analyze problems where the constitutive relationships are nonlinear and nonlocal [33].…”
Section: Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the analysis presented here, the constitutive equations as embodied in Eqs. ( 5) and ( 6) are linear and local, the method can be adapted to analyze problems where the constitutive relationships are nonlinear and nonlocal [33].…”
Section: Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…stress and strain, of RNA nanotubes. We approach the modeling strategy of RNA nanotubes based on the ideas similar to the modeling of carbon nanotubes and several other nanorods (Cheng et al 2009b;Tserpes and Papanikos 2005;Odijk 1986;Kohji et al 1978;Tashiro et al 1978;Badu and Melnik 2017b;Fatehiboroujeni et al 2018;Fang et al 2013;Gupta and Kumar 2018;Fatehiboroujeni et al 2018;Maghsoodi and Perkins 2018;Kumar et al 2016;Schmidt et al 2015;Gupta and Kumar 2017;Venkataiah et al 2018;Badu and Melnik 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Generalized-α method is adopted to compute the numerical solution of this system, subjected to necessary and sufficient initial and boundary conditions. A detailed description of this numerical scheme applied to the rod formulation is given in [69] and references therein. Our computational model has been validated by comparing the critical value of the follower force in the planar cantilever scenario with analytical results of Beck's column [66].…”
Section: A Solution Methodology Accuracy and Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Governing equations following the Kirchhoff approach The continuum rod model that we use follows Kirchhoff's approach [68] assuming each cross-section of the rod to be rigid and is described in detail elsewhere [69].…”
Section: Computational Scheme: Animated Continuum Rod Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%