2019
DOI: 10.1364/oe.27.032523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational rule-based approach for corner correction of non-Manhattan geometries in mask aligner photolithography

Abstract: In proximity mask aligner photolithography, diffraction of light at the mask pattern is the predominant source for image shape distortions such as line end shortening and corner rounding. One established method to mitigate the impact of diffraction is optical proximity correction. This method relies on a deliberate sub-resolution modification of photomask features to counteract such shape distortions, with the goal to improve pattern fidelity and uniformity of printed features. While previously considered for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advances in pattern fidelity and process control, as reflected by Edge Placement Error (EPE) and CDU, are key enablers for yield improvements and scaling to smaller dimensions. Thus, mask dimensions characterization and control are increasingly important [1][2][3][4] . To reduce non-uniformities on wafer, it is crucial to ensure required quality and uniformity already on mask patterns by appropriate control of the mask manufacturing process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in pattern fidelity and process control, as reflected by Edge Placement Error (EPE) and CDU, are key enablers for yield improvements and scaling to smaller dimensions. Thus, mask dimensions characterization and control are increasingly important [1][2][3][4] . To reduce non-uniformities on wafer, it is crucial to ensure required quality and uniformity already on mask patterns by appropriate control of the mask manufacturing process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%