“…[20,28] Moreover,o wing to the regularity and crystallinity of MOF structures,c omputational studies have been successful, and recent high-throughput screening studies have helped in effectively guiding experimentalists. [29][30][31][32][33] In situ or post-synthetic modification, structural and pendant ligands,p rimary and auxiliary metals and metal clusters,a s well as pore sizes,s hape,a cidity,a nd hydrophobicity modifications can direct the uptake capacities,selectivity,sensitivity,and mobility of MOFs and MOF components. [20,28] MOFs have greater surface areas and higher degrees of tunability than other porous materials,s uch as zeolites,e ssential for applications including selective catalysis and low density,high capacity gas storage.C ompared to porous polymers,M OF crystallinity,p eriodicity,a nd permanent porosity makes characterization by X-ray diffraction techniques more amenable.Finally,while covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are often lighter and have larger pore structures that are more stable than in MOF counterparts,M OFs boast more diverse synthetic conditions and the additional tunability provided by the metal structural building unit (SBU)c an permit facile incorporation of photochemical properties,c atalytic centers, and gas sorption sites.…”