2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.13430
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational self-testing of multi-qubit states and measurements

Abstract: Self-testing is a fundamental technique within quantum information theory that allows a classical verifier to force (untrusted) quantum devices to prepare certain states and perform certain measurements on them. The standard approach assumes at least two spatially separated devices. Recently, Metger and Vidick [MV21] showed that a single EPR pair of a single quantum device can be self-tested under standard computational assumptions. In this work, we generalize their techniques to give the first protocol that s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The small change that we make, which is described below, allows us to greatly simplify the proof of correctness while achieving a nearly optimal rate of randomness generation as a function of the total number of bits sent from the quantum device to the verifier, thereby also providing a way of certifying that the quantum device has roughly n bits of quantum memory. We note that a quantum dimension test was recently obtained in [FWZ22] by performing parallel repetition of (a variant of) the protocol from [BCM + 18]. In contrast, our protocol is more efficient (constant rounds, linear communication) and our analysis far more direct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The small change that we make, which is described below, allows us to greatly simplify the proof of correctness while achieving a nearly optimal rate of randomness generation as a function of the total number of bits sent from the quantum device to the verifier, thereby also providing a way of certifying that the quantum device has roughly n bits of quantum memory. We note that a quantum dimension test was recently obtained in [FWZ22] by performing parallel repetition of (a variant of) the protocol from [BCM + 18]. In contrast, our protocol is more efficient (constant rounds, linear communication) and our analysis far more direct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However,[FWZ22], see also[GMP22], proves a stronger rigidity result for their protocol, which extends the qubit test to certain n-qubit states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%