2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2006.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational study of flow in a rocket-based combined cycle (RBCC) engine inlet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a design in which the duct mass can become prohibitive. Therefore, alternative RBCC engine geometries have been proposed including axisymmetric geometries with several small distributed rockets (Escher [7]) or the semi-axisymmetric geometry proposed for the NASA GTX concept vehicle [8][9][10]. Considerable work has also been done on the strutjet engine, which has a rectilinear geometry and uses rockets mounted within the base of several struts [11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a design in which the duct mass can become prohibitive. Therefore, alternative RBCC engine geometries have been proposed including axisymmetric geometries with several small distributed rockets (Escher [7]) or the semi-axisymmetric geometry proposed for the NASA GTX concept vehicle [8][9][10]. Considerable work has also been done on the strutjet engine, which has a rectilinear geometry and uses rockets mounted within the base of several struts [11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The air intake walls are specified as no-slip adiabatic walls which is consistent with the wall boundaries used by Reddy and Sree [52] in their RBCC inlet simulations, which used the NPARC Navier-Stokes code. The domain walls downstream of plane 3 are defined shown in figure 5.2.…”
Section: Flow Domain and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is known that the k-epsilon model is computationally quicker than the SST model, but it is also known that for regions of reverse flow the k-epsilon model over predicts separation [31]. In addition, the SST model is also used as the turbulence model for many other RBCC studies [17,32,33].…”
Section: Fluid Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%