2008
DOI: 10.1051/ijsmdo:2008024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational system for multi disciplinary optimization at conceptual design stage

Abstract: -Presented is a computational system for multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) at the conceptual design stage. During this phase, hundreds of low-fidelity models such as equations and compiled code, and thousands of variables are used to describe a complex product such as aircraft. In this context the paper presents a novel computational approach associated with the complete MDO process. The first aspect of the proposed approach is the dynamic derivation of the optimal computational plan for each design … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of the first one is the modified PP-based method, developed through modification of the PPbased method [27,10]. The second one has taken advantage of the experience gained from the development of the first one and has led to the development of the Double Hyper-cone Boundary Intersection (DHCBI) method [7,8]. The third and latest method developed is the NC+ method.…”
Section: Multiobjective Optimization -Generating a Well-distributed Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of the first one is the modified PP-based method, developed through modification of the PPbased method [27,10]. The second one has taken advantage of the experience gained from the development of the first one and has led to the development of the Double Hyper-cone Boundary Intersection (DHCBI) method [7,8]. The third and latest method developed is the NC+ method.…”
Section: Multiobjective Optimization -Generating a Well-distributed Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it is the conceptual design that determines the majority of the aircraft's life cycle costs [3]. It is therefore advantageous to assess as many air vehicle designs with the highest fidelity analyses possible given the available resources (e.g., human, schedule, and computational) This tradeoff between number of designs analyzed and available resources has typically favored the use of low fidelity closed-form equations and statistical models in conceptual design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%