2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational workflow for functional characterization of COVID-19 through secondary data analysis

Abstract: Summary Standard transcriptomic analyses cannot fully capture the molecular mechanisms underlying disease pathophysiology and outcomes. We present a computational heterogeneous data integration and mining protocol that combines transcriptional signatures from multiple model systems, protein-protein interactions, single-cell RNA-seq markers, and phenotype-genotype associations to identify functional feature complexes. These feature modules represent a higher order multifeatured machines collectively … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some studies already published that performed secondary analysis of previously generated RNA‐seq and microarray data of COVID‐19 patients compared to healthy donors and individuals with other illnesses [e.g., SARS and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), lupus]. 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 Yet, to understand the disease mechanism of SARS‐CoV‐2, RNA‐seq data from long‐COVID patients should be generated not only from blood or blood‐related materials but also from tissue biopsy samples from the affected areas by SARS‐CoV‐2. Furthermore, more systematic analysis of RNA‐seq data combined with other OMICS data (e.g., genomics, proteomics, metabolomics), especially those of time‐course data, are urgently needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are some studies already published that performed secondary analysis of previously generated RNA‐seq and microarray data of COVID‐19 patients compared to healthy donors and individuals with other illnesses [e.g., SARS and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), lupus]. 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 Yet, to understand the disease mechanism of SARS‐CoV‐2, RNA‐seq data from long‐COVID patients should be generated not only from blood or blood‐related materials but also from tissue biopsy samples from the affected areas by SARS‐CoV‐2. Furthermore, more systematic analysis of RNA‐seq data combined with other OMICS data (e.g., genomics, proteomics, metabolomics), especially those of time‐course data, are urgently needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such newly generated data can be compared to the previously generated data as listed in Table 1 to perform a comparative analysis of transcriptomic data to understand how gene expression changes affect COVID‐19 patients. There are some studies already published that performed secondary analysis of previously generated RNA‐seq and microarray data of COVID‐19 patients compared to healthy donors and individuals with other illnesses [e.g., SARS and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), lupus] 26–29 . Yet, to understand the disease mechanism of SARS‐CoV‐2, RNA‐seq data from long‐COVID patients should be generated not only from blood or blood‐related materials but also from tissue biopsy samples from the affected areas by SARS‐CoV‐2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%