2020
DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computationally efficient familywise error rate control in genome‐wide association studies using score tests for generalized linear models

Abstract: and FWER-adjusted p-values can be calculated as an alternative to using a local significance level.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of phenotypic variance explained by significant markers was estimated by dividing the additive genetic variance explained by the marker by the total phenotypic variance ( V p ) for the associated trait: hSNP2=2pq(a2)Vp, where p and q are allele frequencies, and a is the marker effect size (Falconer & Mackay, ). For repeatabel analyses, multiple testing correction was carried out using the FWER approximation method (Halle et al., ). Prior to calculation of significance thresholds, one of each pair of SNPs with correlation r > 0.999 was removed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of phenotypic variance explained by significant markers was estimated by dividing the additive genetic variance explained by the marker by the total phenotypic variance ( V p ) for the associated trait: hSNP2=2pq(a2)Vp, where p and q are allele frequencies, and a is the marker effect size (Falconer & Mackay, ). For repeatabel analyses, multiple testing correction was carried out using the FWER approximation method (Halle et al., ). Prior to calculation of significance thresholds, one of each pair of SNPs with correlation r > 0.999 was removed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of high‐dimensional studies, it is well‐known that FWER‐controlling procedures are conservative and typically lead to substantially less statistical power than procedures that control the proportion of false discoveries 2,28 . A computationally efficient alternative to the MMM approach, based on score test statistics, has been proposed recently 16,29,30 . The latter methodology needs only one fit of a GLM model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale multiple testing under general and strong dependency remains challenging and an active research topic in modern statistics. 7,8,12,13 Among other approaches like, for instance, considering block dependencies in genetics, [14][15][16] several multi-factor models have been proposed to model dependencies among test statistics. [5][6][7][8]13 In particular, a general framework to approximate the false discovery proportion (FDP) has been introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conducting numerous tests poses challenges in meeting the required significance threshold. In high-dimensional GWAS with hundreds of thousands of SNPs, each test is conducted at some nominal significance level, potentially leading to a high number of false positives (FPs) [5][6][7]. This limitation arises from the difficulty of detecting SNPs with minor effects genuinely associated with the disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%