2018
DOI: 10.1177/0142331218763013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computationally efficient image reconstruction algorithm for electrical capacitance tomography

Abstract: The electrical capacitance tomography (ECT) is a visualization measurement method and can reconstruct the spatial permittivity distribution information in a measurement domain based on given capacitance values, in which the effectiveness of the image reconstruction algorithm plays a vital role in real-world engineering applications. Unlike common imaging methods, within the framework of the Tikhonov regularization methodology and the transform-domain sparsity method, a new cost function encapsulating the wavel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But they only considered the sparsity as the single prior information. Moreover, to overcome the limitation of the single prior methods, Tong et al [27] proposed a new cost function with hybrid regularization terms to reduce the artifacts, in which the sparsity and low rank properties of the imaging objects are considered. Guo et al [28] combined the L1-norm and second order total variation (STV) as the regularizers to enhance sparsity and alleviate the staircasing effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But they only considered the sparsity as the single prior information. Moreover, to overcome the limitation of the single prior methods, Tong et al [27] proposed a new cost function with hybrid regularization terms to reduce the artifacts, in which the sparsity and low rank properties of the imaging objects are considered. Guo et al [28] combined the L1-norm and second order total variation (STV) as the regularizers to enhance sparsity and alleviate the staircasing effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, ERT is utilised to recognise geological structures [14][15][16], such as aquifers, aggregates, and metal deposits [8,13,17]. With ECT, the electrical permittivity is determined [18][19][20], but with EIT and ERT, the conductivity is reconstructed [2]. Apart from electrical tomography (EIT, ECT, ERT) [15] and computed tomography (CT) [21], there are numerous other varieties, which can be classified according to the physical phenomenon used: X-rays [22], sound waves [23], magnetism [24][25][26], electromagnetic waves, and visible light [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, reconstruction methods based on the CS theory have been extended for ECT image reconstruction [13,[19][20][21][22][23][24], and the grey-value vector of the image to be reconstructed is transformed into a sparse signal usually by a sparse transform [21][22][23][24]. However, the signal sparsity before and after the sparse transform is not compared, and the fidelity of the sparse signal obtained after the sparse transform to the original signal under different sparsity degrees is not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%