2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computationally efficient predictions of crystal plasticity based forming limit diagrams using a spectral database

Abstract: is an open access repository that collects the work of Arts et Métiers ParisTech researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible.This is an author-deposited version published in: https://sam.ensam.eu Handle ID: .http://hdl.handle.net/10985/13136 To cite this version :Akash GUPTA, Mohamed BEN BETTAIEB, Farid ABED-MERAIM, Surya KALIDINDIComputationally efficient predictions of crystal plasticity based forming limit diagrams using a spectral database -International Journal of Plasticity -Vol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these models are at the macroscale and they are unable to provide insight into micromechanical aspects of the forming process. There has been a limited effort in the past to get insight into the micromechanics of ductile failure (for details see references [58], [59] and references therein). Viatkina et al [58] used strain localisation as the criterion for failure in the polycrystalline aggregate and the response of each of the single crystals in the aggregate was solved using the CPFEM method.…”
Section: Application Of the Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of these models are at the macroscale and they are unable to provide insight into micromechanical aspects of the forming process. There has been a limited effort in the past to get insight into the micromechanics of ductile failure (for details see references [58], [59] and references therein). Viatkina et al [58] used strain localisation as the criterion for failure in the polycrystalline aggregate and the response of each of the single crystals in the aggregate was solved using the CPFEM method.…”
Section: Application Of the Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viatkina et al [58] used strain localisation as the criterion for failure in the polycrystalline aggregate and the response of each of the single crystals in the aggregate was solved using the CPFEM method. Gupta et al [59] used the Marciniak-Kuczynski (M-K) model at the macroscopic scale of the polycrystalline aggregate to simulate sheet-necking along with the CPFEM formulation for the nonporous single crystals. The constitutive model presented here tries to overcome this shortcoming by extending the current crystal plasticity finite element method to incorporate the effects of crystal anisotropy and the phase boundary orientation in the context of porous crystal plasticity.…”
Section: Application Of the Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the group of mean field models, the classical Taylor model [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,39] and the viscoplastic self-consistent model [49,33,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60] are often applied. Essentially, a crystal plasticity formulation together with a numerical homogenization scheme provides the stress-strain relation of a polycrystalline material, i.e.…”
Section: Mean Field Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, both the MK-model and BT are very flexible in terms of the constitutive law. Hence, these mean field polycrystal models are usually coupled with the MKmodel [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,39,49,33,50,52,51,53,54,57,55,56,58,59,60] or BT [39,57,59].…”
Section: Mean Field Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of CP models within homogenization frameworks allows to simulate the response of a full polycrystal including texture evolution by explicitly considering grain orientation and shape changes in the micro-scale (see [8] for a review). Such type of models, due to their verified predictive capacity, have been used in the prediction of the mechanical response under monotonic loading [9,10,11,12,13,14,15] , cyclic loading [16,17,18] and fatigue response [19,20,21,22,23] or to simulate forming processes such as rolling [24,25,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%