Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1161089.1161092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computationally efficient scheduling with the physical interference model for throughput improvement in wireless mesh networks

Abstract: Wireless mesh networks are expected to be widely used to provide Internet access in the near future. In order to fulfill the expectations, these networks should provide high throughput simultaneously to many users. Recent research has indicated that, due to its conservative CSMA/CA channel access scheme and RTS/CTS mechanism, 802.11 is not suitable to achieve this goal.In this paper, we investigate throughput improvements achievable by replacing CSMA/CA with an STDMA scheme where transmissions are scheduled ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
345
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(357 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
345
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of centralized and decentralized approximation algorithms have been proposed and their quality analyzed for this kind of model [14,20,24,31,32]. Most recently, Brar et al [5] present a scheduling method that is based on a greedy assignment of weighted colors. Although these algorithms present extensive theoretical analysis, they are constrained to the limitations of a model that does not reflect the real nature of wireless networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of centralized and decentralized approximation algorithms have been proposed and their quality analyzed for this kind of model [14,20,24,31,32]. Most recently, Brar et al [5] present a scheduling method that is based on a greedy assignment of weighted colors. Although these algorithms present extensive theoretical analysis, they are constrained to the limitations of a model that does not reflect the real nature of wireless networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main factor that limits the network capacity throughput of a wireless mesh network is the interference between neighboring nodes when using a shared medium [1]. The network capacity throughput of a wireless mesh network is determined by the number of non-interfering transmissions that can be achieved at the same time (i.e., transmission concurrency) and their transmission rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the work use some techniques such as compatibility matrix [3] to first find non-interfering transmission pairs and then use centralized algorithms for time slot assignment [4][5] [6] [7]. Various linear programming and heuristic methods are proposed for time slot assignment [8] [1]. These works require prior knowledge of the traffic requirements and the interference relationship between wireless nodes, and assume they do not change frequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several innovative algorithms, both centralized [2], [4], [5], [6] and distributed [7], have been proposed in the literature for generating minimum length STDMA link schedules. Existing work on centralized STDMA link scheduling algorithms can be broadly classified into two categories: graph-based scheduling algorithms and SINR-based scheduling algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing work on centralized STDMA link scheduling algorithms can be broadly classified into two categories: graph-based scheduling algorithms and SINR-based scheduling algorithms. Graphbased scheduling algorithms [2], [4] assume a limited knowledge of the interference and result in low throughput, while SINR-based scheduling algorithms [5], [6] require a complete knowledge of the interference and lead to higher throughput. However, all these algorithms only consider schedule length as their performance metric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%