1996
DOI: 10.1016/0927-0256(95)00074-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computations of effective moduli for microcracked materials: a boundary element approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the crack density is lower than 0.3, all the numerical results are close to the predictions of the differential method. So, the numerical results by Renaud et al (1996) and Zhan et al (1999) are not plotted in the figures for clarity, as they only analyzed the crack density up to 0.3 and 0.35. However, it is noticed that the results by Zhan et al (1999) for crack density of 0.35 are significantly larger than the predictions of the differential method.…”
Section: Comparison Of Micromechanics Models Existing and Present Numentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the crack density is lower than 0.3, all the numerical results are close to the predictions of the differential method. So, the numerical results by Renaud et al (1996) and Zhan et al (1999) are not plotted in the figures for clarity, as they only analyzed the crack density up to 0.3 and 0.35. However, it is noticed that the results by Zhan et al (1999) for crack density of 0.35 are significantly larger than the predictions of the differential method.…”
Section: Comparison Of Micromechanics Models Existing and Present Numentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The validity of these approximations was not verified. The methods by Huang et al (1996), Renaud et al (1996), andZhan et al (1999) do not involve assumptions, and should lead to agreeable results. One possible reason for their discrepancies is that the sample size and/or number of cracks used are not sufficient for the effective moduli to stabilize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The direct approach is generally based on the analysis of displacement discontinuity induced by microcracks and on the fracture mechanics for the propagation of cracks. This approach is used in various works on the determination of the effective properties of microcracked materials Hori, 1990, 1993;Krajcinovic, 1996;Kachanov, 1982;Renaud et al, 1996) and in micromechanical models, for instance, Kachanov (1982); Andrieux et al (1986), Gambarotta and Lagomarsino (1993) and Pensée and Kondo (2001), just to mention a few. The mathematical formulation of direct micromechanical models is relatively simple and does not involve a rigorous upscaling procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In parallel, numerical methods have been broadly applied to calculate the effective mechanical properties of solids with pre-existing cracks, such as the finite element method ( Makarynska et al, 2008;Shen and Li, 2004 ) and the boundary element method ( Huang et al, 1996;Renaud et al, 1996 ). The differential method provides the closest estimation at low crack density, whereas the generalized selfconsistent method or the non-interaction solution is more accurate than the other methods at high crack density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%