AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-6137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computations of Viking Lander Capsule Hypersonic Aerodynamics with Comparisons to Ground and Flight Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shape also has sufficient stability to minimize control system usage. 6 A scaled variant of the Viking 70-deg sphere cone forebody has been employed on every Mars landing mission to date due to its relatively high hypersonic drag coefficient and the existence of a broad set of aerodynamic performance data on this shape. 7 Therefore this forebody shape has a significant heritage beyond the extensive project Viking heritage.…”
Section: A Design Philosophy and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shape also has sufficient stability to minimize control system usage. 6 A scaled variant of the Viking 70-deg sphere cone forebody has been employed on every Mars landing mission to date due to its relatively high hypersonic drag coefficient and the existence of a broad set of aerodynamic performance data on this shape. 7 Therefore this forebody shape has a significant heritage beyond the extensive project Viking heritage.…”
Section: A Design Philosophy and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heatshield OML is geometrically scaled (4.565 scale factor) from the 3.505 m diameter Viking lander 70 degree sphere-cone heatshield. 6 The LM2/LM3 EDL trajectory was initially modeled on a Mars Science Laboratory vehicle EDL parametric analysis, with C B of 63 kg/m 2 and L/D of 0.18. 7 Two degree-offreedom simulations were then performed using the NASA standard Mars atmosphere model and a spherical Mars gravitational potential to size the DGB parachute, descent engines, and vehicle, and optimize the trajectory.…”
Section: A Design Philosophy and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimize risk and development cost, the lander design extensively draws on the Viking lander design database. The heatshield OML is geometrically scaled (4.565 scale factor) from the 3.505 m diameter Viking lander 70 degree sphere-cone heatshield (Edquist, 2006). The descent trajectory is based on analysis for the MSL spacecraft (Braun and Marming, 2007) and utilizes Apollo-type guidance, with center of gravity offset and lifting (a up to 20 degrees) to enable precision landings.…”
Section: Design Philosophy and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerodynamic code has been validated on the Viking lander capsule hypersonic aerodynamics data from onground and on-board measurements, which have been recently used by Edquist for comparison to the LAURA NavierStokes code [21]. A high accuracy, average errors lower than 6%, is achieved for both drag and lift-to-drag coefficients.…”
Section: Newtonian Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%