1992
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.1.1727344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been heralded as a radiation dose-reduction technique [3,4,5,6]. It has been shown, however, that CR does not necessarily deliver lower doses than conventional radiography [7] and correctly chosen screen-film combinations can match CR performance [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been heralded as a radiation dose-reduction technique [3,4,5,6]. It has been shown, however, that CR does not necessarily deliver lower doses than conventional radiography [7] and correctly chosen screen-film combinations can match CR performance [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown, however, that CR does not necessarily deliver lower doses than conventional radiography [7] and correctly chosen screen-film combinations can match CR performance [8]. It is established, however, that CR significantly reduces the need for repeat radiographs [3,9,10,11,12], which is largely due to the wide exposure latitude of CR systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that with computerised systems, digital techniques, such as windowing and image enhancement, may offer some advantages over carbon-fibre-fronted cassettes, but these advantages must be balanced against much higher costs and loss of image resolution [17,18]. The effect of PPCR on radiation doses, compared with more conventional systems, is still under debate [19]. The authors, however, acknowledge the importance of evaluating the cost-effectiveness of PPCR for mobile chest radiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is particularly useful in areas of the body that have a large range of subject contrasts and thicknesses. In examinations of cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine examinations, and lateral hip views, PPCR has resulted in improved visualisation of these difficult areas and a decrease in the number of repeat radiographs [12].…”
Section: Photo-stimulable Phosphor Computed Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%