1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01395709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: A comparison of 2.5 K � 2 K soft-copy images vs digital hard-copy film

Abstract: High resolution soft-copy images are suitable for primary interpretation in patients in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of publications have reported an at least equivalent performance for hardcopy and softcopy reading using CRT monitor devices [2][3][4][5]13]. However, limited information is available concerning the performance of the recently introduced LCD display devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of publications have reported an at least equivalent performance for hardcopy and softcopy reading using CRT monitor devices [2][3][4][5]13]. However, limited information is available concerning the performance of the recently introduced LCD display devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…High resolution versions with high levels of brightness, as well as excellent contrast ratios in the order of 500:1, are commercially available [1]. A number of publications have proven an at least equivalent diagnostic performance compared to hardcopy reading [2][3][4][5]. However, most recent publications have also discussed potential shortcomings, such as the curved surface of the faceplate with potential distortion artifacts, the vulnerability to ambient lighting conditions with subsequently decreased display luminance and the tendency to show distracting reflections on the faceplate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Also the conventional images are interpreted against a light board which enables the radiologist to view several images, concomitantly, while digital images are read on screen at work station in succession or simultaneously, depending on the size and capacity of the screen, the soft ware and the amount of screens .Digital images can be postprocessed at the work station and the diagnostic output may thus be increased. (11,12,13,14,15,16) . Also the study shows that obvious difference were detected between film panoramic and tracing chart reading, in the measurement of appropriate length of implant, these differences are due to the same reason that mentioned in panoramic reading, beside that the tracing chart reading were as standard measures for both implant length and diameters that supply with the implant system, in which the oral surgeon depend on his standard measurements for selection of implant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%