1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6823(1998)6:3<128::aid-roi3>3.0.co;2-#
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed tomographic evaluation of radiation pneumonitis in a canine model

Abstract: The objective of this study was to document the utility of computed tomography (CT) and a three‐dimensional (3‐D) radiotherapy treatment planning system for assessing the development of acute radiation pneumonitis in a canine model. Fourteen dogs were randomly assigned to a nonirradiated control group or one of three radiation dose groups receiving a single fraction of either 12, 15, or 18 Gy delivered to two‐thirds of the right hemithorax. CT and survey radiographs were performed in all dogs prior to and at d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No new drugs have been approved by the FDA for the treatment or prevention of RP, and the mortality rate in patients with severe RP is very high. Several important studies [ 20 ] have already shown how to use Beagle dogs to establish a successful radiation-induced lung injury model. For the first time, we reported consecutive CT-guided core needle tissue biopsies of lung lesions in the same dog at different phases of radiation-induced lung injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No new drugs have been approved by the FDA for the treatment or prevention of RP, and the mortality rate in patients with severe RP is very high. Several important studies [ 20 ] have already shown how to use Beagle dogs to establish a successful radiation-induced lung injury model. For the first time, we reported consecutive CT-guided core needle tissue biopsies of lung lesions in the same dog at different phases of radiation-induced lung injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%