2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed tomographic image of Fahr disease mistaken for acute hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4,8 It was reported in the literature that in Fahr's disease, there were symmetrical and extensive calcifications in the white matter of the cerebral or cerebellar hemispheres and basal ganglia. 4,[8][9][10] As in the present case, the cranial CT findings were typical and consistent with those of FD. Clinical presentations may be quite variable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,8 It was reported in the literature that in Fahr's disease, there were symmetrical and extensive calcifications in the white matter of the cerebral or cerebellar hemispheres and basal ganglia. 4,[8][9][10] As in the present case, the cranial CT findings were typical and consistent with those of FD. Clinical presentations may be quite variable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In suspected cases of FD, other causes of intracranial calcification should be considered such as cerebrovascular lesions, infectious diseases like toxoplasmosis, syphilis and inflammatory illnesses such as systemic lupus erythematosus. 3,10 There is no satisfactory cure for FD or standard course of treatment. Treatment addresses symptoms on an individual basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important part of these calcifications is accidentally recognized in computerized cranial tomography (CT) which is performed due to other causes. Among the radiological methods, as CT is more sensitive for calcifications, it is more valuable in diagnosis of IBGC when compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MR) [10]. In the presence of neuropsychiatric findings together with calcification in imaging methods as a supportive finding, idiopathic basal ganglia calcification should be considered in differential diagnosis if there is no other disease causing this clinical picture, because IBGC is an exclusion diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hastalardaki nöro-psikiyatrik semptomların nedeni araştırılırken ya da başka bir sebeple elde edilen radyolojik görüntülerde serebral ve/veya serebellar simetrik kalsifikasyonların görülmesi ile tanınır. Şiddetli kalsifikasyonlar direkt röntgenogramlarda izlenebilmekle beraber, erken tanı ve küçük kalsifikasyonların gösterilmesinde BBT en duyarlı radyolojik metoddur (19). FH için tipik olan radyolojik bulgulara göre; kalsifikasyonun yaygın olması ve bazal ganglion, talamus, caudat, lentiform ve dentat nukleusta simetrik tutulum şeklinde oldukça tipik dağılım göstermesi gereklidir.…”
Section: Bulgularunclassified