1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00128-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy in the Assessment of the Patient With Pancreatic Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess the economic impact of introducing laparoscopic staging at our institution, we recently completed a prospective study that compared hospital charges for patients who underwent a laparoscopic procedure whether or not they had a subsequent open operation to a group of patients who underwent an open operation alone. Overall charges were 25% lower in the laparoscopic group (data not shown), which is similar to retrospective studies from other centers in the United States and Europe [9,10]. In contrast, some authors have argued that even if the percentage of patients who would benefit from laparoscopic staging is in the range of 10%-20%, this incremental yield over existing state-of-the-art radiology is limited and thus intuitively not a cost-effective utilization of available resources [11].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…In order to assess the economic impact of introducing laparoscopic staging at our institution, we recently completed a prospective study that compared hospital charges for patients who underwent a laparoscopic procedure whether or not they had a subsequent open operation to a group of patients who underwent an open operation alone. Overall charges were 25% lower in the laparoscopic group (data not shown), which is similar to retrospective studies from other centers in the United States and Europe [9,10]. In contrast, some authors have argued that even if the percentage of patients who would benefit from laparoscopic staging is in the range of 10%-20%, this incremental yield over existing state-of-the-art radiology is limited and thus intuitively not a cost-effective utilization of available resources [11].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…80% of articles extracted were review articles, whilst the remaining did not assess SL/LUS as staging modality. Of the remaining 41 articles, 12 studies did not satisfy the eligibility criteria; 22 were for potentially resectable PPC and 7 for PBC [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37] (Supplemental information, Table ST1 to attain pneumoperitoneum and were therefore excluded from our analysis. Therefore, a total of 2,827 patients with PPC and 478 patients with PBC, deemed potentially resectable on preoperative staging, were included for analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resection rates are reported to be as high as 75–92% [28]. The experience of SL combined with ultrasonography in the staging of pancreatic cancer is summarized in table 3 [5, 29, 30, 31]. …”
Section: Clinical Value Of Staging Laparoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%