1995
DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(94)00385-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed tomography dacryocystography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7,12 Although MRI is considered to be the technique of choice for evaluating periorbital soft tissues, CT-DCG depicts surrounding soft tissues reliably despite the limited contrast resolution. 11,12,15,17 In most patients, MRI adds no additional information to the CT-DCG. 16 In addition to the concerns regarding the use of ionizing radiation, CT requires the use of contrast medium to outline adequately the nasolacrimal duct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7,12 Although MRI is considered to be the technique of choice for evaluating periorbital soft tissues, CT-DCG depicts surrounding soft tissues reliably despite the limited contrast resolution. 11,12,15,17 In most patients, MRI adds no additional information to the CT-DCG. 16 In addition to the concerns regarding the use of ionizing radiation, CT requires the use of contrast medium to outline adequately the nasolacrimal duct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The use of CT (both with and without DCG) provides better spatial resolution of the soft tissue and bony structures allowing for more accurate localization of soft tissues masses in relation to the nasolacrimal apparatus relative to conventional DCG. 12,13,[15][16][17] The use of threedimensional reconstruction of CT images also permits the detection of mass effect that may not be evident on routine and oblique DCG radiographs. 13 When evaluating masses located at the medial canthus of the eye with CT scanning, the questions that should be considered are: (1) is the center of mass in the region of the lacrimal sac or nasolacrimal duct?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 These methods are, however, expensive, time consuming, and not widely available. Based on this study, for patients with a clinical diagnosis of FNLDO, we recommend performing oil based contrast macrodacryocystography with a delayed erect film—being reasonably cheap and readily available—and then proceed to lacrimal drainage scintigraphy if contrast radiography is non-contributory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison with the previous methods demonstrates that CT dacryocystography is a very expensive method, demanding a high radiation dose, although is extremely useful in the diagnosis of lacrimal pathways obstruction associated with intranasal diseases, facial fractures and maxillofacial tumors (14,15) .…”
Section: Computed Tomography Dacryocystographymentioning
confidence: 99%