2021
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000024001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed tomography-guided cutting needle biopsy for lung nodules

Abstract: We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy, safety, and radiation exposure between low-dose and standard-dose computed tomography (CT)-guided cutting needle biopsy (CNB) for lung nodules. From January 2016 to August 2017, all consecutive patients admitted with lung nodule underwent low-dose or standard-dose CT-guided CNB procedure in our center. Diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose were compared. A total of 67 and 69 patients who underwent low-dose and standard-dose CT-guided CNB proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnostic yield rates were reported in four trials [ 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 ], with a total of 291 patients undergoing low-dose CT-guided biopsy and 285 undergoing standard-dose CT-guided biopsy. Low-dose and normal-dose groups show no remarkable heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%, Figure 3 A ) in their pooled diagnostic yield rates, which are similar at 48.8% and 51.2%, respectively ( p = 0.55).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Diagnostic yield rates were reported in four trials [ 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 ], with a total of 291 patients undergoing low-dose CT-guided biopsy and 285 undergoing standard-dose CT-guided biopsy. Low-dose and normal-dose groups show no remarkable heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%, Figure 3 A ) in their pooled diagnostic yield rates, which are similar at 48.8% and 51.2%, respectively ( p = 0.55).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 3 studies that looked at how long the biopsy process took, reporting on 221 patients who had a low-dose CT-guided biopsy and 220 patients who had a normal-dose CT-guided biopsy [ 12 , 15 , 16 ]. Neither the low- nor the normal-dose groups showed any significant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%) in the pooled biopsy procedure time (MD = –0.50, p = 0.30, Figure 3 C ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study performed by Zhang et al, the mean effective radiation dose was calculated as 5.3±1.6 mSv, and the doselength product (DLP) was 375.3±115.7 mGy.cm in lung biopsy procedures performed with standard protocol in 69 patients (29). In our study, the mean effective radiation dose was 5.26±3.25 mSv, DLP was 435.25±234.88 mGy.cm, and computed tomography dose index (CTDI) was 124.92± 93.24 mGy, which is similar to the literature data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent studies have focused on the implementation of ULD protocols during percutaneous lung biopsies under CT guidance [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. One of the most robust prospective randomised studies was published by Fu et al, demonstrating a ten-fold decrease of mean DLP (36.0 ± 14.1 mGy cm vs. 361.8 ± 108.0 mGy cm, p < 0.001) and effective dose (0.5 ± 0.2 mSv vs. 5.1 ± 1.5 mSv, p < 0.001) with comparable diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%