2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/7979523
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed Tomography Image Features under Deep Learning Algorithm Applied in Staging Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer and Detection on Ceramide Glycosylation

Abstract: The research is aimed at investigating computed tomography (CT) image based on deep learning algorithm and the application value of ceramide glycosylation in diagnosing bladder cancer. The images of ordinary CT detection were improved. In this study, 60 bladder cancer patients were selected and performed with ordinary CT detection, and the detection results were processed by CT based on deep learning algorithms and compared with pathological diagnosis. In addition, Western Blot technology was used to detect th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al [ 83 ] compared a DL-CNN model based on T2w with VI-RADS to predict muscle invasiveness of BCa and found that were higher AUCs for the DL model compared to two expert radiologists (AUC = 0.963, 0.843, and 0.852, respectively) and the accuracy was higher as the experts for VI-RADS 2 or 3 scores ( p = 0.006). Xu et al [ 84 ] developed a DL algorithm to detect and stage BCa on CT images of 60 patients having the disease. These images have been processed by the DL DCNN based on the You Only Look Once (YOLO) algorithm, and in the clinical staging, the coincidence rates with pathological results were found to be excellent (T1 stage = 50.01%, T2a = 91.65%, T2b, T3 and T4 stage = 100.00%) and not different from the clinical staging of pathological diagnosis ( p > 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li et al [ 83 ] compared a DL-CNN model based on T2w with VI-RADS to predict muscle invasiveness of BCa and found that were higher AUCs for the DL model compared to two expert radiologists (AUC = 0.963, 0.843, and 0.852, respectively) and the accuracy was higher as the experts for VI-RADS 2 or 3 scores ( p = 0.006). Xu et al [ 84 ] developed a DL algorithm to detect and stage BCa on CT images of 60 patients having the disease. These images have been processed by the DL DCNN based on the You Only Look Once (YOLO) algorithm, and in the clinical staging, the coincidence rates with pathological results were found to be excellent (T1 stage = 50.01%, T2a = 91.65%, T2b, T3 and T4 stage = 100.00%) and not different from the clinical staging of pathological diagnosis ( p > 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, to date, their main use is to assess locally advanced disease (≥T3b disease). Some studies addressed BCa staging and AI methods applied to CT and MRI imaging [ 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 ]. However, even if the AUCs were higher for the proposed new models than traditional approaches in almost all studies, there was a large amount of variability, and results need to be validated further to enhance their robustness and reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%