2015 3rd RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICROM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icrom.2015.7367876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed torque control of a cable suspended parallel robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is well-known that in practice, the control system design for CBPRs with model uncertainties and external disturbances, to the extent of the authors' knowledge, is also a challenging task, and it has attracted more attention recently [31][32][33][34]. In order to reduce and eliminate the effect of nonlinear uncertainties and external disturbances on the controller of the robots, a few of approaches for CBPRs are presented, such as nonlinear adaptive control, sliding mode control, robust model predictive control, time-delay control, computed torque control, fuzzy logic control, and so on [35][36][37][38][39]. Izadbakhsh et al [40] proposed a robust adaptive controller for cabledriven parallel robots subject to dynamic uncertainties, while the stability of the control system was analyzed with a Lyapunov-based method.…”
Section: Pick-and-place Trajectory Tracking Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is well-known that in practice, the control system design for CBPRs with model uncertainties and external disturbances, to the extent of the authors' knowledge, is also a challenging task, and it has attracted more attention recently [31][32][33][34]. In order to reduce and eliminate the effect of nonlinear uncertainties and external disturbances on the controller of the robots, a few of approaches for CBPRs are presented, such as nonlinear adaptive control, sliding mode control, robust model predictive control, time-delay control, computed torque control, fuzzy logic control, and so on [35][36][37][38][39]. Izadbakhsh et al [40] proposed a robust adaptive controller for cabledriven parallel robots subject to dynamic uncertainties, while the stability of the control system was analyzed with a Lyapunov-based method.…”
Section: Pick-and-place Trajectory Tracking Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Werner et al established an analogous model of the CDPM, then identified system parameters, pulley friction, and load, and finally implemented feed-forward and integral controllers to improve control accuracy [24,25]. Other reported algorithms used in the control of CDPMs are composite control [26], computed torque control [27], robust PID control [28], and adaptive control [29]. However, previous studies could not meet the tension accuracy requirements for lunar takeoff simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear Sliding Mode Controller (SMC) and feasible workspace analysis for a cable suspended robot with input constraints is presented in [11]. All the above efforts for deriving kinematic and dynamic equations tend to present a simple model of CDPR that could works in an online manner with common control approaches while precision is not devastated [12,13]. Many researches illustrates effectiveness of the precise modeling of the robot in the controlling procedure [14,15], howe-Slika 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%