Computer-administered interviews and rating scales.

Abstract

To evaluate the value of computer-administered interviews and rating scales, the following topics are reviewed in the present article: (a) strengths and weaknesses of structured and unstructured assessment instruments, (b) advantages and disadvantages of computer administration, and (c) the validity and utility of computer-administered interviews and rating scales. Computer-administered evaluations are more comprehensive and reliable and less biased than evaluations routinely conducted in clinical practice. Also, the use of continuous monitoring systems, which increasingly entail the use of computer administration, has been related to improved treatment outcome. However, the use of computer-administered interviews and rating scales will sometimes lead to false positive diagnoses, and for this reason, it is recommended that computer assessment be combined with clinical judgment.

Do we know when our clients get worse? an investigation of therapists' ability to detect negative client change

“…The results of this study strengthen the argument that this clinical task is very diffi cult and highlights the assistance that a feedback system can provide. Several studies have demonstrated the benefi t that such measures can add to routine clinical judgment (Garb, 2007).…”

A Dimensional Comparison of a Self-Report and a Structured Interview Measure of Conduct Disorder

“…Advantages of self-report instruments include economy, ease of administration, and facilitation of disclosure, because respondents are less likely to underreport socially undesirable behaviors when questions are self-administered rather than posed by an interviewer (Garb, 2007;Tourangeau & Yan, 2007). However, for antisocial individuals with tendencies to manipulate, deceive, and minimize faults, ability and willingness to accurately self-report deviant behaviors may be compromised (Lilienfeld, 1994;Whyte et al, 2006;cf.…”

One-year follow-up results of unsupported online computerized cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in primary care: A randomized trial

“…One might question the equality of computerized questionnaires and paper-and-pen versions. However, there are sufficient indications that they show similar psychometric properties (Carlbring et al, 2007;Garb, 2007;Schulenberg & Yutrzenka, 2001). Third, as we did not include a no-treatment group in our study, we do not know whether the modest improvements were significantly better than doing nothing.…”