2013 International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icecco.2013.6718225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer aided brain tumor detection with histogram equalization and morphological image processing techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work realized by [12] describes a computer-aided detection system for detecting tumors. This framework is based on histogram equalization and morphological mathematical operations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work realized by [12] describes a computer-aided detection system for detecting tumors. This framework is based on histogram equalization and morphological mathematical operations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A neuro‐fuzzy segmentation procedure of the MRI information is introduced in to distinguish different tissues like white matter, gray matter, CSF, and tumor. Some other critical investigates are in …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other critical investigates are in. [19][20][21] The combination of multiple classifiers that are utilized from that K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm effectively classified the brain tissues. Moreover, MRF (Markov Random Field) method powerfully employed, but this method has a high computational cost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods developed for this purpose include artificial neural networks (Logeswari and Karnan, 2010), masking (Akram and Usman, 2011), grey scale thresholding (Rulaningtyas and Ain, 2009), fuzzy logic (Khotanlou, Colliot, Atif, and Bloch, 2009), rule-based approaches (Chan, 2007) and clustering methods (Wu, Lin, and Chang, 2007). Furthermore, using different classification methods after identifying a potential tumor region is another commonly used method of detection (El-Dahshan, Hosny, and Salem, 2010; Jayachandran and Dhanasekaran, 2013; Naik and Patel, 2014; Ulku and Camurcu, 2013). In such methods, other factors like structural quantities also become applicable since features derived from pixel values are inadequate in most cases (Xuan and Liao, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%