Design Computing and Cognition ’04 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2393-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Aided Conceptual Design of Building Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A criticism of all of the above systems, as Mora et al [7] point out, is that they do not look at the design problem in its entirety, although Mora et al neglect to consider building services. This lack occurs because the necessary techniques are still being developed and inevitably, given the nature of research projects and the difficulty of the challenge, they are being developed in a piecemeal fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A criticism of all of the above systems, as Mora et al [7] point out, is that they do not look at the design problem in its entirety, although Mora et al neglect to consider building services. This lack occurs because the necessary techniques are still being developed and inevitably, given the nature of research projects and the difficulty of the challenge, they are being developed in a piecemeal fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, it must be recognised that the ideal system is one which allows all members of the design team to collaborate in the decision making process with all disciplines being given equal status. Thus the concept of Mora et al [7], where the architect makes the initial decisions and the structural system is then made to fit within this concept, is not practical because this will significantly restrict the search process. What is needed is a system where the impact of the decisions made by each design discipline is transparent so that, for example, when designers impose constraints, they are able to assess the impact of their decision on the ability of the rest of the design team to reach a good solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are two fundamental approaches for zoning. One approach is that the zoning is applied with the aid of a computer design tool (Mora et al, 2004), figure 1, whereas another approach is that zoning is a part of a more or less autonomous design solution cycle (Hofmeyer et al, 2005), figure 2. The last mentioned approach can be compared with the approach of shape grammars that generate design solutions (Kotsopoulos, 2005), often used for space related problems but here applied to structural design problems.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction of spatial and structural design is not specifically defined but it is hoped that the managing of spatial and structural agents will yield interaction automatically (Fenves et al, 1994). The second project session 15: digital design methods -eCAADe 23 | proposes a methodology to synthesize structural systems within a spatial design (Mora et al, 2004). The building design process is regarded as more or less linear: the structural system follows the spatial design, however some feedback from the structural system towards the spatial design is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%