Computer‐aided design system upgrade process: a case study

Abstract

Reports on the computer‐aided design (CAD) upgrade implementation process at PBR Automotive Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia. Views the implementation as successful since many of the desired outcomes have been achieved or surpassed. The key success factors were detailed planning, user involvement and vendor support. These combined to create an atmosphere of excitement in the project and success. Reports on the future plans that include the development of an integrated information system at PBR which will involve customers and suppliers in addition to internal personnel. The CAD system upgrade serves as a launching board for the development of such a system.

Improvement of agility and sustainability: A case study in an Indian rotary switches manufacturing organisation

“…However, it is a coinciding fact that, few researchers have espoused the superiority of Pro/E. For example, Nandkeolyar et al (1997) have reported a case study in which the design engineers and mangers of a company have favoured the use of Pro/E to the maximum extent. They have also pointed out that Pro/E is the widest package used for CAD modeling.…”

Agility through the interfacing of CAD and CAM

“…They have identified that "CAD/CAM users' appreciation of integration", "communication between design office and other users", "training", "organisational effectiveness", "management commitment and support", "security of CAD/CAM interface" and "user friendliness of ERP systems" as the critical factors. Chang et al (1997) have pointed out the absence of a technology to integrate CAD/CAM Rapid introduction of new and modified products; dynamic reconfiguration of production processes; upgradable products; product customisation (Lee 1998) Capability to operate profitably in an environment of continuous and unpredictable changes (McGaughey 1999) Reduction in lead time and life expectancy of products; diversification of demand; new technologies (Ismail et al, 2006) Demand volume is relatively low and life span is comparatively short (Elkins et al, 2004) Improved design realization by reducing the number of iterations and accelerating shop drawing development and improvement (De Lapp et al, 2004) The necessity of reacting quickly to changes in apparel trends and meeting ever increasing competition made apparel producers apply CAD/CAM systems in their production processes (Yan and Fiorito 2007) Increased profit margins, reduced design time; robust design; sharing of new designs and prototype creation in very short period of time (Lin and Uhler 2002) Shorten design cycle (Nandkeolyar et al, 1997) Cutting design costs; reducing cycle time; reducing matching time; improving information flow (Soliman et al, 2001) The interfacing of CAD and CAM with scheduling and control. They have brought out a solution to overcome this deficiency using parametric technology.…”

“…CAD field has witnessed various stages of development. During the past one decade, Pro/E software (hereafter referred to as Pro/E) marketed by Parametric Technology Corporation is widely used by the CAD engineers (Nandkeolyar et al, 1997). During the beginning period of its launch, Pro/E could not be used in standalone personal computers (PCs).…”

Design agility through computer aided design

“…A very little emphasis has been given on the agility through design of products. During the past several years, the design field has been witnessing tremendous developments (Nandkeolyar et al , 1996). Particularly, “computer aided design” (CAD) technology has been extensively used by the product designers (Holst and Bolmsjo, 2001).…”