2009
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer‐aided detection of metastatic brain tumors using automated three‐dimensional template matching

Abstract: Purpose: To demonstrate the efficacy of an automated three-dimensional (3D) template matching-based algorithm in detecting brain metastases on conventional MR scans and the potential of our algorithm to be developed into a computer-aided detection tool that will allow radiologists to maintain a high level of detection sensitivity while reducing image reading time. Materials and Methods:Spherical tumor appearance models were created to match the expected geometry of brain metastases while accounting for partial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The true positive over false positive ratio T p : F p in [10] is approximately 1:10 versus 1:2.7 per brain in our case. Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The true positive over false positive ratio T p : F p in [10] is approximately 1:10 versus 1:2.7 per brain in our case. Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Subsequent affine adaptation and asymmetrybased pruning stages result in low false positive F p tumor detections. Our average 95.3% detection rate, average 3-10 false positives F p per brain (Table 1), and under 3 minute run-time (on a standard PC running Intel Core i7) are an improvement over state-of-the-art algorithms (average detection rate 90%, average F p per brain 34.8 by [9][10], and 30 minutes using template matching in [10]). The detection results can also be applied to other brain abnormality detection tasks using the final 3D blobs as features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational image descriptors quantify visual characteristics at different scales from ROIs, which can be readily translated into radiological image analysis pertaining to tumor volumetric shapes and visual appearance dynamics. For example, the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) 2122 is computed through key point detection by using a difference-of-gaussians (DoG) function and local image gradient measurment with radius and scale selections (as illustrated in Fig.1). This permits a quantitative measurement of the tumor shape so that subtle variation during treatment (i.e.…”
Section: Quantitative Image Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of these algorithms to human interpretation could potentially lead to greater sensitivity and improved accuracy of intracranial metastases characterization, based both on standard postcontrast exams as well as advanced physiologic imaging such as perfusion-related acquisitions (Ambrosini et al, 2010; Yang et al, 2013; Szwarc et al, 2015). …”
Section: Enhancing Detection Of Small Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 99%