DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Aided Microcalcification Detection on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Data: A Preliminary Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25][26][27][28][29] Compared with the detection of masses, studies investigating the detection of microcalcification clusters on DBT are more preliminary. [30][31][32][33] Reiser et al 30 investigated the detection of microcalcifications on individual PVs. The detected microcalcifications were then backprojected into the 3D volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[25][26][27][28][29] Compared with the detection of masses, studies investigating the detection of microcalcification clusters on DBT are more preliminary. [30][31][32][33] Reiser et al 30 investigated the detection of microcalcifications on individual PVs. The detected microcalcifications were then backprojected into the 3D volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a data set of 30 image sets with microcalcification clusters and 30 image sets without visible findings, their detection method achieved a sensitivity of 86% with 1.3 false-positive (FP) clusters per DBT volume. Bernard et al 31 developed an algorithm for the detection of microcalcification clusters on filtered back-projection reconstructed slices. The voxel contrast was enhanced by convolving the image volume with a Mexican hat wavelet at a specific scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sahiner et al [3] proposed a system for detecting clustered microcalcifications from 3D volumes in a 3D approach. In another study, Bernard et al [4] proposed a method for microcalcification detection from filtered back-projection reconstructed slices with a Mexican hat wavelet based enhancement. Though, many research efforts have been made for efficiently detecting microcalcifications in DBT, false-positive (FP) rate is still high to be useful in clinical practice [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computerized lesion detection in DBT can be performed in the multiple PV images, the tomosynthesized volume, or a combination of both. Bernard et al 3 performed microcalcification detection in FBP-reconstructed slices. Reiser et al 4 performed microcalcification detection on the PV images before reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%