1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3812(99)00089-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided molecular design with combined molecular modeling and group contribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
97
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The properties that are evaluated in this test are "essential properties," as previously defined by Harper et al 59 These constraints form part of the overall design problem (P) and are an s-dimensional subset g 1 ðnÞ of gðx; nÞ such that g 1 : N ! R s .…”
Section: Test 1: Solvent Handling Feasibility Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties that are evaluated in this test are "essential properties," as previously defined by Harper et al 59 These constraints form part of the overall design problem (P) and are an s-dimensional subset g 1 ðnÞ of gðx; nÞ such that g 1 : N ! R s .…”
Section: Test 1: Solvent Handling Feasibility Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, CAMD methods can be regarded as the reverse engineering approach to property prediction, as the target properties are known while the molecules that match them need to be determined. Typically, almost all CAMD methods use group contribution (GC) based property prediction methods (from Franklin, 1949to Hukkerikar et al, 2012 to evaluate the generated compound with respect to the specified set of desirable target properties (Harper et al, 1999). The GC-based methods belong to a class known as additive methods (Hukkerikar et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constantinou et al (1996) proposed a systematic strategy for generating isomers from a set of groups. Harper et al (1999) proposed a framework for CAMD method, where the predesign phase defines the basic needs, the design phase determines the feasible candidates (generates molecules and tests for desired properties) and the post-design phase performs higher level analysis of the molecular structure and the final selection of the product. Samudra and Sahinidis (2013) proposed a new optimization model using relaxed property targets and refined property targets with structural corrections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Employing systematic algebraic techniques to design molecules based on GCM decreases the permutations of groups that need to be checked if they have a valid molecule hidden in them. Algorithms to identify the molecules that meet the process targets have been developed by many research groups, including Marcoulaki and Kokossis (1998), Harper et al (1999), Harper and Gani (2000), Eljack et al (2007) and Chemmangattuvalappil et al (2009). In this contribution, the focus is to introduce methods that improve the efficiency of solving the molecular design problem as part of the simultaneous solution of process and product design problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%