1986
DOI: 10.1002/bms.1200130709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided peptide sequencing by fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry

Abstract: This paper proposes an efficient method for computer-aided peptide sequencing based on fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry. The method allows us to analyse peptides much larger than loo0 u within a reasonable cpu time and to have a set of amino acid sequences which are consistent with the observed fast atom bombardment mass spectrum to varying degrees. Another feature is that there is no need to pick sequence ion peaks out of the spectrum; all the ions observed are equally taken into account in the analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative algorithm, that was first demonstrated on data obtained from electron ionization (EI) mass spectra of peptide derivatives, 15 and was subsequently used on fast-atom bombardment (FAB), 16,17 highenergy CID 18 and low-energy CID 19,20 data is sometimes referred to as 'subsequencing'. In this approach, small sequences that represent only a portion of the total sequence are tested against the mass spectrum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative algorithm, that was first demonstrated on data obtained from electron ionization (EI) mass spectra of peptide derivatives, 15 and was subsequently used on fast-atom bombardment (FAB), 16,17 highenergy CID 18 and low-energy CID 19,20 data is sometimes referred to as 'subsequencing'. In this approach, small sequences that represent only a portion of the total sequence are tested against the mass spectrum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De novo sequencing [17][18][19][20][21][22] has become a method of prominent importance in the field of functional proteomics. De novo sequencing is necessary because database search procedures [23,24] often fail if the proteins are modified, unknown, mutated, artificially created via, e.g., combinatorial techniques, are from unknown species or cancerous cells [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic residues (as strong proton acceptors) in the middle of a peptide sequence almost regularly lead to highly complicated fragmentation spectra which can be very difficult to interpret unequivocally. Several algorithms for de novo sequencing were reported [17][18][19][20][21][22], but none of them has been shown to be absolutely reliable and efficient if MS-MS data were obtained from non-ideal fragmentation processes. They use experience based or learned information about fragmentation behavior of peptides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assist in the sequencing of peptides by MS/MS, another computer program called LUTEFISK was written in-house, which uses only the MS/MS data from low-energy collision-induced dissociations of multiply-charged precursors to derive a list of possible sequences (Johnson et al, 1991). This program is conceptually similar to that used by others (Ishikawa & Niwa, 1986;Johnson & Biemann, 1989;Yates et al, 1991). As with MADMAE, the LUTEFISK output scores correspond to the fraction of product ion current that can be accounted for according to the fragmentations shown in Scheme 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%