2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided system for predicting the histology of colorectal tumors by using narrow-band imaging magnifying colonoscopy (with video)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
79
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial studies report the usefulness of CAD for colorectal polyps using still images obtained from magnifying NBI observations [12,13] . As opposed to CAD using still images, 2 Japanese groups have developed CAD with real-time endoscopy [14,15] . These real-time CAD systems are operated during the actual endoscopic observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial studies report the usefulness of CAD for colorectal polyps using still images obtained from magnifying NBI observations [12,13] . As opposed to CAD using still images, 2 Japanese groups have developed CAD with real-time endoscopy [14,15] . These real-time CAD systems are operated during the actual endoscopic observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, endoscopists usually take a lot of pictures of a polyp for finding a good image of the polyp for a paper-based report with medical evidences (Aabakken, 2009). In the clinical workflow, it would be helpful if an objective diagnosis by a computer-aided system as a kind of second opinion could be provided onto the video monitor directly or for pictures taken during the examination (Takemura et al, 2012). This can be used in two ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For computer analysis of vascularization features on NBI, Tischendorf et al 28 reported a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 61.2%, Gross et al 29 a sensitivity of 95.0% and a specificity of 90.3%, and Takemura et al a sensitivity of 97.8% and a specificity of 97.9%. 30 All of these are very high diagnostic performances; however, these diagnostic systems were not fully automated but required manual operation during image acquisition and processing by the system. In this regard, our newly developed EC-CAD provides fully automated diagnoses, requires no manual operation, and facilitates real-time decision making during endoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%