1995
DOI: 10.1002/oti.6150020304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer‐assisted cognitive rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain damage: Four case studies

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to investigate the value of computer‐assisted activities for four individuals with brain damage. Individuals were trained in cognitive functions in their homes to compensate for cognitive impairment, assisted in work activities and helped in leisure time occupations. The four people received individually adapted computers and peripheral equipment, and the environment was changed to accommodate their needs. Each person received guidance and instruction from an occupational therapist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Summary of goal setting approaches used in published studies Formal Goal Setting Approaches n=73 (77%) Studies where approach is described Studies where approach is evaluated GAS (n= 31) A framework for documenting individualised goals in quantifiable manner. It is a five-point scale where the expected outcome is projected and levels of goal attainment are stated objectively (Malec, 1999) Smigielski , Malec, Thompson, & DePompolo, 1992;Larsson, Nyström, Vikström, Walfridsson, & Söderback, 1995;Malec, 1999;Malec, 2001;Dahlberg et al, 2007;Mastos, Miller, Eliasson, & Imms, 2007;Turner-Stokes & Ashford, 2007;Bovend' Eerdt, Botell, & Wade, 2009;Fietzek et al, 2009;Turner-Stokes, Williams, & Johnson, 2009;Bovend'Eerdt, Dawes, Sackley, Izadi, & Wade, 2010;Braden et al, 2010;Rasquin et al, 2010;Turner-Stokes & Williams, 2010;Borg et al, 2011;Ertzgaard, Ward, Wissel, & Borg, 2011;Graven et al, 2011;de Kloet, Berger, Verhoeven, Van Stein Callenfels, & Vliet Vlieland, 2012;Grant, Ponsford, & Bennett, 2012;De Joode, Van Heugten, Verhey, & Van Boxtel, 2013;Brands, Bouwens, Gregório, Stapert, & van Heugten, 2013;Sunnerhagen & Francisco, 2013;Bender, Bauch, & Grill, 2014 (n=24) Zweber & Malec, 1990;Malec et al, 1991;Joyce et al, 1994;Bouwens et al, 2009;McPherson et al, 2009;Hale, 2010;Bergquist et al, 2012…”
Section: Approaches To Goal Setting Used In Research Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary of goal setting approaches used in published studies Formal Goal Setting Approaches n=73 (77%) Studies where approach is described Studies where approach is evaluated GAS (n= 31) A framework for documenting individualised goals in quantifiable manner. It is a five-point scale where the expected outcome is projected and levels of goal attainment are stated objectively (Malec, 1999) Smigielski , Malec, Thompson, & DePompolo, 1992;Larsson, Nyström, Vikström, Walfridsson, & Söderback, 1995;Malec, 1999;Malec, 2001;Dahlberg et al, 2007;Mastos, Miller, Eliasson, & Imms, 2007;Turner-Stokes & Ashford, 2007;Bovend' Eerdt, Botell, & Wade, 2009;Fietzek et al, 2009;Turner-Stokes, Williams, & Johnson, 2009;Bovend'Eerdt, Dawes, Sackley, Izadi, & Wade, 2010;Braden et al, 2010;Rasquin et al, 2010;Turner-Stokes & Williams, 2010;Borg et al, 2011;Ertzgaard, Ward, Wissel, & Borg, 2011;Graven et al, 2011;de Kloet, Berger, Verhoeven, Van Stein Callenfels, & Vliet Vlieland, 2012;Grant, Ponsford, & Bennett, 2012;De Joode, Van Heugten, Verhey, & Van Boxtel, 2013;Brands, Bouwens, Gregório, Stapert, & van Heugten, 2013;Sunnerhagen & Francisco, 2013;Bender, Bauch, & Grill, 2014 (n=24) Zweber & Malec, 1990;Malec et al, 1991;Joyce et al, 1994;Bouwens et al, 2009;McPherson et al, 2009;Hale, 2010;Bergquist et al, 2012…”
Section: Approaches To Goal Setting Used In Research Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%