2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer assisted recognition of breast cancer in biopsy images via fusion of nucleus-guided deep convolutional features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 8 shows that the method proposed in this paper is superior to many state-of-the-art methods in benign and malignant tumor recognition, both for the image level and the patient level. It is worth mentioning that works (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43) did not split training and test set according to the protocol of (9), works (44,45) adopted the existed protocol, and works (46,47) randomly divided training set (70%) and test set (30%), but they did not mention whether it was the same as the protocol. Although the recognition accuracy of the works (37, 39, 41-43, 46, 47) is significantly higher than that of our method, they all use deep learning model, which requires a large number of labeled training samples and consumes longer training time.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 8 shows that the method proposed in this paper is superior to many state-of-the-art methods in benign and malignant tumor recognition, both for the image level and the patient level. It is worth mentioning that works (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43) did not split training and test set according to the protocol of (9), works (44,45) adopted the existed protocol, and works (46,47) randomly divided training set (70%) and test set (30%), but they did not mention whether it was the same as the protocol. Although the recognition accuracy of the works (37, 39, 41-43, 46, 47) is significantly higher than that of our method, they all use deep learning model, which requires a large number of labeled training samples and consumes longer training time.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of examining all patches, the authors of [18] proposed to focus on selected nuclei patches, which are extracted using Laplacian blob detector algorithm. The features are extracted using CNN and image-wise classification is performed using patch probability decision method and patch feature fusion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, are the strides which are parameters of neural network that changes the movement of images, 1 , 2 , and 3 are the filter of feature maps, the other layers like ReLU and FC are explained in Eqs. (5,6).…”
Section: Convolutional Neural Network (Cnn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAD serves as the basis for counting the cells and for the study of subcellular morphology such as the investigation of shape, texture, and size of the cellular components. The detection of cell nuclei is difficult during the analysis of histopathological images such as target cells that are in various states [6]. The smaller cells will be surrounded by the background clutters made up of histopathological structures such as collagen, capillaries, etc., along with the irrelevant visual aspects and artefacts which occur during the acquisition of images [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%