2000
DOI: 10.1007/s100169910024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Assisted Ultrasonographic Analysis of Carotid Plaques in Relation to Cerebrovascular Symptoms, Cerebral Infarction, and Histology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We excluded 17 that were validation studies comparing plaque imaging with histology [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] ; 7 that failed to provide sufficient data for each group 25,26,50 -54 ; 4 that were highly selected studies 19,[55][56][57] ; 2 that included patients with extracranial restenosis 58,59 ; and 8 that were duplicate records. 1,3,5,14,21,60 -62 The group sizes were very different in 1 study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded 17 that were validation studies comparing plaque imaging with histology [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] ; 7 that failed to provide sufficient data for each group 25,26,50 -54 ; 4 that were highly selected studies 19,[55][56][57] ; 2 that included patients with extracranial restenosis 58,59 ; and 8 that were duplicate records. 1,3,5,14,21,60 -62 The group sizes were very different in 1 study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,10,31 These various cut-off points may be attributable to different choices for the standardization of the reference values. 5,12 For the purpose of the present study, we decided to choose the threshold value of 50 by using the usual recommended reference values for the blood and the adventitia. However, we believe that other cut-off points should also be further investigated to determine the most sensitive threshold value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, various cut-offs have been used. 9,36,37 We used the 25th percentile of GSM score because this value was low enough to identify hypoechoic plaques in a number of patients sufficiently high for statistical analysis purposes. Importantly, the cut-off value we found (i.e.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%