2012
DOI: 10.28945/1711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Attitude of Teaching Faculty: Implications for Technology-Based Performance in Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research pinpoints to a difference between two types of faculty utilizing ICT in their instruction; those favoring the use of new pedagogies integrated with technologies and those that resist to learning new technology-oriented approaches to teaching [34]. Some instructors feel overwhelmed by ICT and opt out of investigating the possibilities that ICT offers to education [35].…”
Section: University Instruction and Ictmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Research pinpoints to a difference between two types of faculty utilizing ICT in their instruction; those favoring the use of new pedagogies integrated with technologies and those that resist to learning new technology-oriented approaches to teaching [34]. Some instructors feel overwhelmed by ICT and opt out of investigating the possibilities that ICT offers to education [35].…”
Section: University Instruction and Ictmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since online instructors' attitudes towards the ELS have focused on opinions and perceptions of its performance, their level of e-readiness can influence their use and application of technology tools needed to assist online learners, and is reflected in successful course outcomes and user satisfaction (Hung et al 2014;Larbi-Apau and Moseley 2012). There is a need to further examine the influence of technology factors on online instructors during the phases of delivering a course apart from evaluating the technology itself (McGill et al 2011;Motaghian et al 2013;Panda and Mishra 2007).…”
Section: Online Instructor E-readinessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The number of participants in our study was 217, which was sufficient to validate the instrument. Other validation studies used varied numbers of participants, ranging from 20 40 to 369. 34 The validation process used in this study included content validation through experts' opinions and construct validation through EFA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of participants in our study was 217, which was sufficient to validate the instrument. Other validation studies used varied numbers of participants, ranging from 20 40 to 369. 34 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%