2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer‐based evaluation of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment patients during a picture description task

Abstract: Introduction We present a methodology to automatically evaluate the performance of patients during picture description tasks. Methods Transcriptions and audio recordings of the Cookie Theft picture description task were used. With 25 healthy elderly control (HC) samples and an information coverage measure, we automatically generated a population-specific referent. We then assessed 517 transcriptions (257 Alzheimer's disease [AD], 217 HC, and 43 mild cognitively impaired… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

14
79
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
14
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies dedicated to evaluate early language signs in prodromal or preclinical stages, such as MCI (Taler and Phillips, 2008 ; Drummond et al, 2015 ; Szatloczki et al, 2015 ; Hernández-Domínguez et al, 2018 ), reports inhomogeneous results. For example some authors described significant differences between controls and MCI in semantic fluency and naming tests (Ostberg et al, 2005 ; Duong et al, 2006 ; Radanovic et al, 2007 ; Cuetos et al, 2009 ; Joubert et al, 2010 ; Ahmed et al, 2013 ; Mueller et al, 2016 ), while others did not confirm differences in Boston Naming, semantic and phonemic verbal fluency (Bschor et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies dedicated to evaluate early language signs in prodromal or preclinical stages, such as MCI (Taler and Phillips, 2008 ; Drummond et al, 2015 ; Szatloczki et al, 2015 ; Hernández-Domínguez et al, 2018 ), reports inhomogeneous results. For example some authors described significant differences between controls and MCI in semantic fluency and naming tests (Ostberg et al, 2005 ; Duong et al, 2006 ; Radanovic et al, 2007 ; Cuetos et al, 2009 ; Joubert et al, 2010 ; Ahmed et al, 2013 ; Mueller et al, 2016 ), while others did not confirm differences in Boston Naming, semantic and phonemic verbal fluency (Bschor et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other groups of researchers have applied the analysis of discourse on verbal productions recorded during the classic episodic memory tests as the Wechsler logical memory (Roark et al, 2007 , 2011 ). The most ambitious studies have also used analytical tools applicable directly on the voice recordings of subjects (Meilán et al, 2014 ), showing a good correlation between the automated classification and that based on clinical and manual data processing (Roark et al, 2011 ; Satt et al, 2013 ; Hernández-Domínguez et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fraser et al [29] carried out additional prosodic analysis on the Pitt recordings, extracting 42 melfrequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) features [30]. Others have used a similar approach [31], [32]. Another recent study 1 Data available at DementiaBank, http://dementia.talkbank.org/ successfully used these recordings to extract low-level speech features (vocalisation events and speech rate) and used them to train a system for AD detection [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es por esto que la variedad de fenómenos en los diferentes niveles de la lengua han motivado nuevos estudios cuyo fin es conformar un catálogo exacto de las características lingüísticas más afectadas o mejor preservadas durante la DTA (Fraser, Meltzer & Rudzicz, 2016;Asgari, Kaye & Dodge, 2017;Hernández-Domínguez, Ratté, Sierra-Martínez & Roche-Bergua, 2018;Toledo, Aluísio, dos Santos, Brucki, Trés, de Oliveira & Mansur, 2018;Toth, Hoffmann, Gosztolya, Vincze, Szatloczki, Banreti & Kálmán, 2018) para dar cuenta del impacto de la demencia en el procesamiento cognitivo de acuerdo a cada etapa (de Lira, Ortiz, Campanha, Bertolucci & Minett, 2011;Ahmed, Haigh, Jager & Garrard, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified