1988
DOI: 10.1002/sce.3730720406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer conferencing as a resource for in‐service teacher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They were afraid that there might be grammatical mistakes in the messages that they created, or they might appear to be asking stupid questions. As points out, in textual communication, participants worry about the appearance of their text She maintains that "for some, the appearance of the text becomes one's 'signature', and making typos or other errors is perceived as a detraction from one's image" (p. 50); see also Kimmel et al (1988) in which there were only a minority of the participants in their Electronic Exchange System (EIES) authoring comments. Similarly, Wells (1992) points out that when students were first exposed to CMC in distance education programmes, they were hesitant to contribute to discussion "because of a fear of appearing unintelligent or exposing vulnerabilities" (p.13).…”
Section: Vulnerability Of Text-based Communication and 'Face'mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were afraid that there might be grammatical mistakes in the messages that they created, or they might appear to be asking stupid questions. As points out, in textual communication, participants worry about the appearance of their text She maintains that "for some, the appearance of the text becomes one's 'signature', and making typos or other errors is perceived as a detraction from one's image" (p. 50); see also Kimmel et al (1988) in which there were only a minority of the participants in their Electronic Exchange System (EIES) authoring comments. Similarly, Wells (1992) points out that when students were first exposed to CMC in distance education programmes, they were hesitant to contribute to discussion "because of a fear of appearing unintelligent or exposing vulnerabilities" (p.13).…”
Section: Vulnerability Of Text-based Communication and 'Face'mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In view of the feedback from teachers, modifications were made to the software which gives teachers four options when sending in public messages: anonymous, using personal name alone, using school name alone, or using both (see Kimmel et al, 1988, where users were given the options of using a regular signature, pen name or anonymity). Subsequently, it was felt that signing off a message as anonymous has an undesirable effect of secrecy and this option was changed to "An English teacher".…”
Section: Vulnerability Of Text-based Communication and 'Face'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este es un tema que se ha estudiado también en diversos trabajos de investigación, de los que se han deducido algunas conclusiones interesantes. Por ejemplo el uso de las TICs en actividades de formación favorece la familiarización del profesorado con estas herramientas y mejora sus recursos didácticos (Kimmel et al, 1988), permite…”
Section: El Papel De Las Tics En La Formación Del Profesoradounclassified
“…Some electronic networks have provided opportunities for participants to use pseudonyms, although the justification for this decision, and an explanation for its effects, has not always been provided (Kimmel et al, 1988). In another reported application in a first year elementary teacher education course, the instructor in the course did not participate in discussions and all students did so anonymously 'to encourage nondominated dialogue' (Harrington and Quinn-Leering, 1995).…”
Section: Anonymity and Network Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%