2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045005553.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer control versus manual control of systemic hypertension during cardiac surgery

Abstract: We conclude that, compared with manual control, computer control of systemic hypertension significantly improved hemodynamic stability during cardiac surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithms used in these systems are based on integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models of the anesthetic agent to continuously predict and customize target organ concentration and expected effects (level of anesthesia, mean arterial pressure, etc.). Similar approaches have been used for other anesthetics (see [63][64][65][66] for examples), as well as for vasoactive and chronotropic drugs such as nitroglycerin and nitroprusside [67][68]. The method outlined herein may thus be readily applied to systems such as those described above to improve pharmacokinetic parameter prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The algorithms used in these systems are based on integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models of the anesthetic agent to continuously predict and customize target organ concentration and expected effects (level of anesthesia, mean arterial pressure, etc.). Similar approaches have been used for other anesthetics (see [63][64][65][66] for examples), as well as for vasoactive and chronotropic drugs such as nitroglycerin and nitroprusside [67][68]. The method outlined herein may thus be readily applied to systems such as those described above to improve pharmacokinetic parameter prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Computer-based point of care guidance systems have been used in a number of critical care settings [21][22][23][24] . They can facilitate guidance incorporating complex patient state assessment and offer the possibility of closed loop control 10,25,26 . Thus far, the uptake has been low despite some evidence of clinical effectiveness 27,28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%