1992
DOI: 10.1016/0747-5632(92)90031-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer friends and foes: Content of undergraduates' electronic mail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
1
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
52
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This could have been a result of the small number of men in either ofthe two classes. The lack ofgender effects did not match expectations based on the literature, which stresses differential experience for males and females (McCormick & McCormick, 1992). It may be that males in social science courses also are less computer experienced.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could have been a result of the small number of men in either ofthe two classes. The lack ofgender effects did not match expectations based on the literature, which stresses differential experience for males and females (McCormick & McCormick, 1992). It may be that males in social science courses also are less computer experienced.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…McCormick and McCormick (1992) collected students' electronic mail at their university over a one-semester period. Before beginning this collection, they posted a notice to all e-mail users that the electronic mail system was not private and that their mail might be read by other people.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors found virtually no differences in degree of gossip between men and women but some differences in content (women talked more about relationships; men talked more about sports figures and other public figures). Dunbar et al (1997) also eavesdropped in public places, and McCormick and McCormick (1992) lurked online to find a high concentration (52%) of "social topics" in an analysis of e-mail messages.…”
Section: Eavesdroppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It targeted aspects of email including the understanding of message tone, intent, and how to improve the conveyance of these message aspects. While a great deal of research has been devoted to determining the effects of electronic communication's removal of social context cues (Sproull & Kiesler, 1991;McCormick & McCormick, 1992), little has been done in the way of measuring individual differences in how the removal of those cues impacts effective use of written communications. Future efforts should be focused on more specific identification of the aspects of electronic and other written communication that are relevant for identifying and interpreting the tone and intent of a communication.…”
Section: Summary and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%