2017
DOI: 10.1177/1362168817690183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-mediated textual and audio glosses, perceptual style and L2 vocabulary learning

Abstract: The current study examined the effects of first language (L1) textual and audio glosses along with the moderating effect of learners’ visual and auditory perceptual style on second language (L2) vocabulary learning. The participants were first divided into two groups of auditory and visual learners based on their scores obtained from a learning style questionnaire. Then, each style group was further subdivided into three groups who received a text via a screen including a number of unfamiliar vocabulary items … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
32
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study are thus consistent with previous research that provided evidence for the benefits of both paper‐based glosses (e.g., Hulstijn et al., ; Laufer & Shmueli, ) as well as computerized glosses (e.g., Al–Seghayer, ; Chun & Plass, ; Rassaei, ; Yanguas, ) for vocabulary learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the present study are thus consistent with previous research that provided evidence for the benefits of both paper‐based glosses (e.g., Hulstijn et al., ; Laufer & Shmueli, ) as well as computerized glosses (e.g., Al–Seghayer, ; Chun & Plass, ; Rassaei, ; Yanguas, ) for vocabulary learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies have mostly investigated the effects of print‐based textual glosses on L2 vocabulary learning (e.g., Hulstijn et al., ; Laufer & Shmueli, ). A number of studies have also investigated the effectiveness of technology‐based textual, audio, video, and pictorial glosses for vocabulary learning (e.g., Al–Seghayer, ; Chun & Plass, ; Rassaei, ; Yanguas, ). The following example illustrates computerized textual glossing with the definition of the word displayed for a learner in a comment box after the learner clicks on the underlined word.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The findings of the present study agree with the results of many studies which revealed the effectiveness of multimedia glosses in improving vocabulary learning (e.g., Çakmak, 2014;Chiu, 2013;Hassan, 2010;Hu, Vongpumivitch, Chang, & Liou, 2014;Jalali & Neiriz, 2012;Kongtawee & Sappapan, 2018;Lee & Lee, 2015;Lee, Lee, & Lee, 2016;Lee, Warschauer, Lee, 2017;Loucky & Tuzi, 2010;Moazzeni, Bagheri, Sadighi, & Zamanian, 2014Moradan & Vafaei, 2016;Oe & Alam, 2013;Poole, 2011Poole, , 2012Poole & Sung, 2016;Rashtchi & Aghili, 2014;Rassaei, 2018;Razagifard, 2010;Rouhi & Mohebbi, 2012aSalem, 2006;Tabatabaei & Shams, 2011;Türk & Erçetin, 2012;Yanguas, 2009;Yun, 2011;Zoi, Bellou, & Mikropoulos, 2011) while they disagree with a less number of studies which found no significant effect for multimedia glosses on vocabulary gains (e.g., Boers, Warren, He, & Deconinck, 2017;Faramarzi, Elekaei, & Koosha, 2014;Sato, 2016;Sato & Suzuki, 2010). This goes along with Choi's (2016) contention that empirical findings to date have demonstrated favorable effects of multimedia glosses on learners' vocabulary knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%