1995
DOI: 10.1080/13642819508239038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer modelling of three-dimensional cellular pattern growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, where the size distributions FðrÞ in the following simulations depend linearly on r for small grain sizes: the vertex model, 6,10) 2D Monte Carlo model, 7) variational principle, 8) Surface Evolver program 9) and atomic jump model, 11) where n ¼ 2 has been obtained. A slightly increasing m-value with decreasing r in the 3D vertex model 6) may occur from insufficient data for such small grains.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2, where the size distributions FðrÞ in the following simulations depend linearly on r for small grain sizes: the vertex model, 6,10) 2D Monte Carlo model, 7) variational principle, 8) Surface Evolver program 9) and atomic jump model, 11) where n ¼ 2 has been obtained. A slightly increasing m-value with decreasing r in the 3D vertex model 6) may occur from insufficient data for such small grains.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On normal grain growth, there have been extensive studies including the curvature-driven growth model, 1) diffusion-like growth model, 2) statistical analysis, 3) stochastic model 4) and numerical simulations. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Despite a variety of the analyzing methods, most of the studies predict an n-value of 2, and thereby n ¼ 2 has widely been recognized as the theoretical grain growth exponent for normal grain growth. In those studies giving n ¼ 2, however, the obtained size distributions of grains in a steady state are various.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models that describe grain growth, such as the stochastic method (Monte Carlo method), 3) and topological network models such as the phase field method, 4) front tracking model 5,6) and vertex model, [7][8][9][10] have already been proposed and developed. These models are superior in the sense that they handle the orientations of individual grains, and under certain limited conditions, they can successfully describe…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9) Since the grain boundary is normally not a straight line, approximation as a straight line is a drawback. In the initial vertex model, virtual vertices are positioned along the grain boundary, which improves the model 10,11) by employing multi-vertices, and the grain boundary is approximated by broken lines. This improved vertex model is based on physical principles, so it is considered to be suitable for describing grain growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, models that describe grain growth such as the stochastic method (Monte Carlo method) 4) and topological network models, which includes the phase field method, 5) front tracking model 6,7) and vertex model, [8][9][10][11] have already been developed. These models are superior in that they take the crystal orientation of each grain into consideration and describe grain growth under specified conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%